ValComply.ai assesses a report against a defined framework rather than a subjective impression. The framework brings two lenses, proportionate tiers, a tier-adjusted grade and a practical acceptability outcome together into a single, defensible review.
Whether the evidence, reasoning, calculations and adopted value can be independently examined, traced and tested. This asks: could another competent professional follow how the value was reached, and would the evidence support it?
Whether the scope and level of detail are reasonable for the property, purpose and risk. A concise report can be entirely appropriate for a simple, well-evidenced asset; a complex assignment demands more.
These lenses are complementary, not competing. A report is not penalised for being concise where concision is appropriate, nor excused for thin evidence where the assignment demands depth.
Standard residential or common commercial property, ample comparable evidence, limited complexity and low uncertainty. A concise, well-evidenced report can fully satisfy the assignment.
More material value, reduced market homogeneity, unusual attributes, or additional tenancy, title or evidence considerations that warrant closer reasoning.
Specialised property, thin or indirect evidence, related-party arrangements, development potential, complex lease or title matters, or significant valuation uncertainty. The report must demonstrate its reasoning in depth.
Reported alongside the grade because quality and fitness for purpose are related but not identical.
Each assessment records how strongly the adopted value is supported by the material in the report.
Every finding carries a severity so that effort is focused where it genuinely affects reliability.
Areas that do not apply to a given assignment are marked accordingly rather than counted against the report.
Property, interest, purpose, basis of value, dates and reliance.
Approach adopted, its suitability, and any cross-checks.
Comparable evidence, adjustments and how the value is derived.
Physical attributes, title, tenancy, planning and encumbrances.
Special assumptions, limiting conditions and their disclosure.
Clarity, internal consistency and completeness of the report.
The framework is designed around widely recognised valuation reporting principles. It supports professional review; it does not certify compliance with any particular standard or determine regulatory acceptance.
Request a demonstration and we will walk through a full assessment.